The discussion in the comment sections for the last couple of posts has degenerated . This is largely due to one Weinland follower who has posted a number of insults. When asked to back up his claims for the divinity of Ron's revelations, he responds with yet another insult. It's taking on the tone of a squabble in the back seat of a a car with a 6-year-old. "Did Not!" "Did Too!"
I don't believe that most of Weinland's followers are like that. In any case this one follower is giving the other followers a bad name. Particularly since he posts as "Anonymous" making it difficult for a visitor to this blog to understand that all of these negative posts are coming from just one individual.
I've taken a largely hands-off policy towards comments, but I see that I need to change that a bit and tighten up my comment policy. Two rules:
(1) No ad-hominem attacks against me or other commenters. The insults don't personally bother me after considering the source, but it effects the tone here. Mocking and/or criticizing the False Witness, the False Witnessess, or their mouthpieces is an exception to this, but a few facts should accompany the mocking and criticism.
(2) No anonymous commenting. While the form may allow it, I will clean up after. And if I liked your comment I will hate it when I delete it. You're not required to register although that is encouraged. Choose the Name/URL option and fill in a nickname that you'll consistently use when posting here. URL is absolutely not required.
If you're a Weinland follower there's no objection to you posting here. But provide a more substantive argument than of the sort "I believe Ron because of the 50 truths". Without preaching, substantiate that. And if someone has another argument, respond to the argument rather than insulting the other person. And if you have objections to my content, don't call it "slander and lies". (And look up the definition of the word "slander".) If you think something I've said is wrong, provide some facts rather than simply saying that I lie and distort. I actually have corrected an error in the past from a comment.
Contact Me: Mike, at the Email Address on the Mailbox Below
False Prophet Ronald Weinland and Silent Prophetess Laura Weinland
The Two Witlesses in Belgium on Pentecost, 2007. Just under 5 years before their deaths in the streets of Jerusalem on May 23, 2012 (Postponed from Sept 25, 2011).
About Me
- Mike (Don't Drink the Flavor Aid)
- Email: [ekimks AT gmail DOT com] I grew up in the Radio/Worldwide Church of God, but rejected that nonsense even though it was shortly before the 1972 "end time". I have since been free of HWA and his crap, but have family members still involved in Armstrongism. Herbie's long dead, so it's kind of hard to pay him back. But there are plenty of other money-grubbing false prophets to pay forward.
Ron and Laura Relaxing Mid-Day on the Sabbath at Starbuck's
January 12, 2008 on Australia's Gold Coast. Will Laura cackle at Ron's joke as she often does during sermons?
7 comments:
What the heck, Mike?? Has it been like a week long full moon or something? It's like everyone's gone nuts on all the blogs.
Maybe the First Trumpet blew, a year late.
Are we there yet?
Mike, anoymous keeps poking me! Tell him to stop it!.
Dill Weed
New blogspot address come May 1st:
ronaldweinlandtheprophetwhofailed.blogspot.com
Dill Weed, don't make me pull this car over!!!
Mike, keep your eyes on the road!!!
He did it first!!! I didn't do nuthin!!! Ow! Don't touch me! Mike! He touched me!
It is a simple case of logic.
1: Logic dictates that if Ron weinland is Gods prophet and he speaks through him and ONLY through him (as is claimed), then purely in the logical sense (and indeed common sense), he can not make any errors either in his prophecies or indeed teachings/doctrine in general or the whole system of "divine guidance" is flawed and thus void.
2: If one still refuses to acknowledge the above then you are admitting subconciously that the God Ron claims he follows is also flawed or atleast in his communications ability or why would his God keep giving him false information and false prophecies?.
3: Another response to #2 above would perhaps be "we simply don't understand God's plan...this is why things did not pan out in april 2008 etc"....and also the common argument of "he is only human and therefore capable of errors as it is a continuous revelation". Again i reply and simply say: In reality there is STILL nothing that sets him apart (in the divine sense) from any other preacher or prophet as we could say the same about all of those people too and make tons of excuses for them.
Ron is therefore in PURE reality no different to anyone else attempting to interpret scripture who is capable of errors. Result= he is not Gods prophet/witness or every other preacher and false prophet are THE final witness also.
Result: He IS a False Prophet.
End note: As i have been watching the news about the Mexican Swine flu outbreak...i have no doubt whatsoever that Ron will use this to scare and manipulate his followers even more as do all the so called prophets of God. I hope some of you read all the above lol.
Post a Comment